SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 51875

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
R. NARAYANA PISHARADI, J
SAVITHA DUTT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


O R D E R

The orders passed by the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Kottayam in the applications for discharge filed by the accused in the case C.C.No.5/2014 are under challenge in these revision petitions filed under Section 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Code') and the Criminal Miscellaneous Case filed under Section 482 of the Code.

2. There are altogether eleven accused in the case.

Accused No.1 was the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (PWD), Roads Division, Alappuzha during the period from 02.12.2002 to 31.05.2003. Accused No.2 was the contractor engaged by the PWD for conveyance of packed bitumen from the Kochin Refineries Limited (KRL). Accused No.3 was the Assistant Engineer of the PWD Section, Alappuzha during the period from November 1999 to October 2004. Accused No.4 was the Assistant Engineer of the PWD Section, Cherthala during the period from 03.06.2002 to 31.01.2005. Accused No.5 was the Executive Engineer, PWD Roads Division, Alappuzha during the period from 27.06.2003 to 31.08.2005. Accused No.6 was the authorised agent of Accused No.2. Accus

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top