HIGH COURT OF KERALA
USHA C., – Appellant
Versus
INDANE – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
Petitioner challenges Ext.P7 order by which Ext.P1 letter of intent issued to the petitioner allotting LPG godown is canceled on the ground that petitioner could not get approval for the construction of godown or find out alternate land suitable for the godown even after the lapse of 24 months of issuance of LOI. Ext.P1 Letter of intent was issued on 30.07.2018. According to petitioner she had entered into a lease agreement for construction of the godown in that property, which is 400 meters away from the main road and took steps for getting permit for construction of the godown. It is stated that as per the official records the road to the leased property was having 7 meters' width from the starting point to end point. But she could not get approval from the town planner. As per Ext.P4 letter, the town planner rejected the application stating that sufficient width of 7 meter was not available on all portions of the road as required under Rule 61(4) of Kerala Panchayath Raj Building Rules 2011, under which 7 meters' motorable road is a prerequisite. Aggrieved by Ext.P4 petitioner had approached this Court in W.P. (C).No.21066 of 2019 and this Court disposed of the w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.