HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SHIRCY V., J
NIDHIN.S.R – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Appl./2327/2021
Bail - Pre-arrest Bail - IPC Sections 323, 498A - The court granted pre-arrest bail under conditions after assessing the nature of accusations, ensuring cooperation in investigation, and safeguarding evidence integrity.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought pre-arrest bail in a case of physical and mental cruelty registered against them under IPC sections. The defacto complainant alleged assaults and injuries inflicted by one of the petitioners during their marriage.
Finding of the Court:
The court found it appropriate to grant pre-arrest bail, considering the circumstances and potential for misuse of the criminal justice system while ensuring conditions to preserve the investigation.
Issues: Whether the petitioners are entitled to pre-arrest bail given the gravity of the accusations and the ongoing investigation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court balanced the seriousness of the allegations with the rights of the accused to not be unjustly detained prior to trial, particularly when investigation was ongoing.
Final Decision: Pre-arrest bail granted under specified conditions.
ORDER
Dated this the 23rd day of March 2021 Application for pre-arrest bail.
Petitioners are the accused in Crime No.68/2021 of Chombala Police Station, Kozhikode District registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323 , 498A r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The prosecution case is that, the 1st petitioner had married the defacto complainant as per the rites and ceremonies of the Hindu community on 02.03.2020 and while they were residing together as husband and wife, she was subjected to both physical and mental cruelty by these petitioners. She was also assaulted by the 1st petitioner and caused injuries to her. Thereby they have committed the aforesaid offences.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that they were falsely implicated in the case at the instance of the defacto complainant, who is having high influence over the police. But they apprehend arrest and hence this application.
4. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that the investigation of the case is well in progress.
5. Having regard to the nature of the accusations levelled against these petitioners and the other facts and circumstances involved in this case, I am inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to them subject to the following conditions:
(i) Petitioners shall be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) each with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the investigating officer in the event of their arrest.
(ii) They shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation as and when required by him, in writing.
(iii) They shall co-operate with the investigation and trial of the case.
(iv) They shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(v) They shall not commit any offence while on bail.
In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.