SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 22524

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SHIRCY V., J
NIDHIN.S.R – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.U.P.BALAKRISHNAN

ORDER

Dated this the 23rd day of March 2021 Application for pre-arrest bail.

Petitioners are the accused in Crime No.68/2021 of Chombala Police Station, Kozhikode District registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323 , 498A r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code .

2. The prosecution case is that, the 1st petitioner had married the defacto complainant as per the rites and ceremonies of the Hindu community on 02.03.2020 and while they were residing together as husband and wife, she was subjected to both physical and mental cruelty by these petitioners. She was also assaulted by the 1st petitioner and caused injuries to her. Thereby they have committed the aforesaid offences.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that they were falsely implicated in the case at the instance of the defacto complainant, who is having high influence over the police. But they apprehend arrest and hence this application.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that the investigation of the case is well in progress.

5. Having regard to the nature of the accusations levelled against these petitioners and the other facts and circumstances involved in this case, I am inclined to grant pre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top