SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 18673

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
MARY JOSEPH, J
THOMAS ABRAHAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.ESM.KABEER, SRI.P.K.BABU, SRI.R.SANTHOSH BABU

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 5th day of January, 2021 This Appeal is directed against the judgment in C.C.No.586 of

2002 of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Thiruvalla (for short, 'the trial court'). The judgment was pronounced by the court in a prosecution filed by the appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, the N.I Act').

2. The allegations in the complaint was that the accused borrowed a sum of Rs.50,000/- from the complainant on 11.10.2000 and when that amount was demanded back, a cheque dated 21.12.2001 drawn on Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. Chengaroor extension counter was executed and issued. The cheque was presented for encashment before the Corporation Bank at Pathanamthitta Branch on 04.01.2002 and it was dishonoured on 09.01.2002 for the reason of insufficiency of funds in the account maintained by the accused with the Bank. Memo to intimate about the bouncing of the cheque was issued to the complainant from the Bank on 17.01.2002. Statutory notice in writing demanding repayment of the amount within 15 days and apprising the factum of dishonour of the cheque, was issued to the accused. Despite receipt of the notice, the amount demanded

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top