Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
AMIT RAWAL, J
DR.A.AUGUSTIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. refusal to provide hra based on location. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding entitlement to hra. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations and justifications. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. final ruling and related decisions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. overall conclusion and direction for payment. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has come out with the following prayers:
(i) Declare that Non-providing of House Rent Allowance (HRA) and City Compensatory Allowance (CCA) to the petitioner working in the Headquarters of Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara as applicable to Thrissur Corporation by the respondents as highly illegal, unjust, arbitrary and discriminatory.
(ii) Declare that Ext-P5 and Ext-P13 pay revision orders and Ext-P15 and Ext-P16 orders by the 1" respondent and Exhibit-P6 and P7 orders by the 2 respondent refusing to grant higher rate of House Rent Allowance (HRA) and City Compensatory Allowance (CCA) to the petitioner working in the Headquarters of Kerala Agricultural University, Veilanikkara as applicable to Thrissur Corporation as highly illegal, unjust, arbitrary and discriminatory.
(iii) To Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, ord
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
