SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 44078

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
M.R.ANITHA, J
.... – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
K.M.FIROZ, M.SHAJNA

ORDER

Dated : 19th November, 2021

1. This Crl.M.C. has been filed against the order dated

06.03.2021 in CMP No.17/2021 in S.C.No.347/2019 of the Fast Track Special Judge, Kozhikode.

2. Petitioner is the sole accused in S.C.No.347/2019 which has been registered for the offences punishable u/s.376(2)(f)(i) of IPC and Section 3 (a) r/w. Section 4 , Section 5 (i), 5(m) and 5(n) r/w. Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012 .

3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, prosecution witnesses except the investigating officer have already been examined. CMP No.17/2021 has been filed by the accused under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for recalling PWs 1 and 2 victim and her mother. By by the impugned order the learned Special Court dismissed the petition. Aggrieved by the same, he came up before this court.

4. Notice was issued to the respondent and leanred Public Prosecutor appeared for the respondent – State.

5. Heard both sides.

6. Copy of the impugned order has been produced as Annexure A1. It would go to show that Section 311 petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging that during examination of PWs 1 and 2 accused failed to give instruction to his advocate regarding some of the questions t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top