SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 40550

DR.E.RADHAKUMARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

[WP(C).1033/2020, WP(C).37075/2017, WP(C).37448/2017, WP(C).6804/2018, WP(C).10302/2018, WP(C).13210/2018, WP(C).13925/2018, WP(C).29294/2018, WP(C).30370/2018, WP(C).30805/2018, WP(C).33401/2018, WP(C).33502/2018, WP(C).34150/2018, WP(C).34244/2018, WP(C).39740/2018, WP(C).21514/2019, WP(C).24113/2019, WP(C).24121/2019, WP(C).24755/2019, WP(C).24987/2019, WP(C).26033/2019, WP(C).31509/2019, WP(C).31949/2019, WP(C).32979/2019, WP(C).960/2020, WP(C).1235/2020, WP(C).15193/2020, WP(C).15404/2020, WP(C).16485/2020, WP(C).23294/2020, WP(C).23416/2020, WP(C).23783/2020, WP(C).23808/2020, WP(C).26553/2020, WP(C).27081/2020, WP(C).27465/2020, WP(C).27519/2020, WP(C).6213/2021, WP(C).6657/2021]

Dated this the 18th day of March 2021 This order of mine shall dispose of thirty nine writ petitions, whereby common question of facts and law involved. The grievance of the petitioners are that by virtue of an amendment in Rule 14E of Part III, Kerala Service Rules (KSR), introduction of contions though are not aggrieved, “except” the expression 'Regular' in clause (b)(i) in Rule 14E.

2. All the petitioners had initially joined as Junior lecturers after undergoing the regular selection proces

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top