HIGH COURT OF KERALA
N. Nagareesh, J
MUMTHAS C – Appellant
Versus
TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY – Respondent
JUDGMENT
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Petitioners 1 and 2, who are Primary Departmental Teachers working in Ugrapuram and Manjeri in Malappuram District, have filed this writ petition seeking to quash Exts.P1 and P2 communications issued by the 2nd respondent- Manager, Pandikkad Branch of the Kerala State Financial Enterprises Limited, directing the employers of the petitioners to recover the entire loan dues of the 5th respondent, who is a subscriber of a chitty, from the salary of the petitioners at the ` rate of 10,000/- per month.
2. The petitioners state that they have no transactions with the 2nd respondent-Pandikkad Branch of the KSFE, though they are subscribers of chitty conducted by the KSFE, Manjeri Branch. The petitioners were enrolled in the chitty by one Rahmathulla, who is the husband of the 6th respondent. The 6th respondent is a Staff Nurse in Government service. The 6th respondent is also a subscriber of chitty of KSFE. The petitioners state that Rahmathulla, the husband of the 6th respondent, compelled the petitioners to stand as surety for the chitty prized by the 6th respondent. The petitioners gave their salary certificates as surety for the chitty of the 6th respondent.
3.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.