SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 43020

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
V. G. Arun, J
THE STATE OF KERALA – Appellant
Versus
RAJAMMA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI, SPL.GP(FORESTS) SANDESH RAJA K.

O R D E R

This review petition is filed by the respondents in the writ petition. As per the judgment sought to be reviewed, the challenge against Exhibit P12 order, refusing the writ petitioner's demand to survey his property comprised in old Survey No.283/1A of Perumpetty Village, was upheld and the 3rd respondent was directed to consider Exhibit P1 representation with reference to the findings in the judgment in M.S.A.No.1 of 1981 and to pass orders thereon. The review petition is filed primarily on the ground that, subsequent to the judgment in the writ petition, the Honourable Supreme Court has, by order dated 3.7.2019 in SLP.No.2291 of 2019, ordered status quo with respect to the findings in MSA.No.1 of 1981. According to the review petitioners, the said order renders the direction in the judgment otiose and hence the judgment is liable to be reviewed.

2. Heard Sri.Sandesh Raja, learned Special Government Pleader (Forests) for the review petitioner and Sri.Millu Dandapani, learned counsel for the respondent/writ petitioner.

3. Sri.Sandesh Raja drew attention to paragraphs 15 and 16 of the judgment in the writ petition and the direction therein to contend that the judgment is rend

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top