SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 18001

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. Muhamed Mustaque, SOPHY THOMAS, JJ
SAJEER KANIYARAKKAL, – Appellant
Versus
NASEERA PALLIKKAL, – Respondent


Advocates:
O.V.BINDU, SRI.C.K.SREEJITH

JUDGMENT

A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.

This appeal is at the instance of the husband challenging a decree granted to the respondent-wife under the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 .

2. The respondent-wife filed an original petition before the Family Court, Thalassery, seeking divorce under the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act on three grounds: (i) for non-providing maintenance for a period of two years, (ii) failure on the part of the husband to discharge a marital obligation and (iii) on the ground of cruelty. These statutory grounds are enumerated under Section 2 (ii), 2(iv) and 2(viii) of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 . The Family Court, on appreciation of the pleadings and evidence, found that the respondent made out a case for divorce on all the grounds as canvassed in the petition for divorce.

3. The marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnised in accordance with the Muslim Personal Law on 29.04.2010. In that wedlock, two children were born. It has come out in the evidence that the appellant has contracted another marriage and is living along with the second wife. It is also come out in evidence that the husband failed to provide mainten

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top