SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 15013

ANUJ AUSTIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
['SAIJO HASSAN', '', 'SMT P PARVATHY', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR', 'ARUN ASHOK']

ORDER

Petitioner is the accused in crime No.100/2021 of Hill Palace Police Station, Ernakulam, which is registered for the offences punishable under Section 75 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and Sections 323 and 509 of IPC.

3. It is alleged that the petitioner, who is the father of the defacto complainant, a girl aged 16 years, while staying together at Kent Hyde Park Villa No.3, Thripunithura manhandled the defacto complainant with his hand and abused her using filthy language with an intention of insulting the modesty of the defacto complainant and thereby petitioner committed the offence aforementioned.

4.

When the case came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that no serious injury has been sustained to the defacto complainant, though he admitted the fact that he just beaten his daughter. It is also his contention that the relationship between himself and the mother of the victim has been strained and they have already filed petition for mutual divorce before the Family Court, Ernakulam. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is out of these matrimonial issues, this false case has been foisted agains

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top