Back
S.MANIKUMAR, CJ, J, SHAJI P.CHALY, J
ALEESHA SHEREEF – Appellant
Versus
THE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF ADVANCED LEGAL STUDIES – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and grievances of the appellant. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claims regarding examinations and entitlement under the act. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's assessment of university compliance and appellant's failure to follow procedures. (Para 12 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. conclusion of appeal dismissal. (Para 16) |
JUDGMENT
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
The appeal is preferred by the petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 3863 of 2020 challenging the judgment of the learned single Judge dated 23.06.2020, whereby the writ petition was disposed of recording that the National University of Advanced Legal Studies—first respondent has taken appropriate action and conducted the further examinations in tune with the provisions contained under the guidelines issued by the University Grants Commission by issuing question papers with objective type questions and granting additional time of one hour to the appellant, who is having hearing impairment.
2. The University has also assured before court that they will extend all the benefits for which appellant is entitled, in accordance with Ext.P3 guidelines as well as the guidelines issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, (Depart
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
