Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANIKUMAR, CJ, SHAJI P.CHALY, J
DR. PREMACHANDRAN KEEZHOTH – Appellant
Versus
THE CHANCELLOR KANNUR UNIVERSITY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judgment initiation and procedural framework for vice chancellor appointments. (Para 2) |
| 2. background facts and the context of the re-appointment. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments concerning eligibility and statutory compliance. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 26) |
| 4. court's observation on re-appointment procedures and compliance. (Para 21 , 22 , 30) |
JUDGMENT
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
This appeal is preferred by the petitioners in W.P.(C) No. 26975 of 2021 challenging the judgment of the learned Single dated 15.12.2021 dismissing the writ petition by declining the following reliefs:
1. Issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records leading to Ext. P5 and quash the same.
2. Issue a writ in the nature of quo warranto calling upon the 4th respondent to explain under what authority the 4th respondent is holding the office as the Vice Chancellor of the 3rd respondent University in violation of the statutory mandate;
2. The question to be decided in this case arises under Section 10 of the Kannur University Act , 1996 ('Act, 1996' for short) dealing with the appointment of the Vice Chancellor, and the consequential re- appointment. In the case on hand, as per Ext. P5 order, the 4th respo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
