Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ALEXANDER THOMAS, VIJU ABRAHAM, JJ
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
DR.IBSON SHAH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to tribunal's order (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. obc-ncl status entitlement criteria (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. focus on civil service examination criteria (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. details of applicant's family employment (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. submission of required documentation (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. arguments against eligibility determination (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. evaluation of arguments presented (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 8. court's reasoning in granting ncl status (Para 28 , 32) |
| 9. final determination of the applicant's request (Para 33 , 34 , 36 , 37) |
JUDGMENT
Alexander Thomas, J.
Ext.P1 final order dated 13.10.2020 rendered by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench in O.A.No.718 of 2018, filed by the sole respondent herein, is under challenge before us in this Original Petition filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India , at the instance of the Union of India & another/respondents in the O.A.
2. Heard Sri. Shivshankar R. Panicker, learned Senior Central Government Standing Counsel, appearing for the petitioners in the O.P./R1 & R2 in the O.A. and Sri.P.Nandakumar, learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent in the O.P/sole applicant in the O.A. before the Trib
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
