Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. B. Suresh Kumar, C.S. Sudha, JJ
ABDULKHADER – Appellant
Versus
VIJAYAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. various interconnected suits concerning partition and property. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. plaintiffs' claims about property ownership and transfers examined. (Para 10 , 11 , 14) |
| 3. court's legal reasoning supporting upholding ownership. (Para 15 , 16 , 20) |
| 4. affirmation of overall decision to dismiss appeals. (Para 17 , 25) |
| 5. legal standing of plaintiffs challenged based on ownership rights. (Para 18 , 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT
P.B. Suresh Kumar, J.
Among these appeals, R.F.A No.346 of 2014 is one preferred against the decree and judgement in O.S.No. 111 of 2006 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Manjeri. Similarly, R.F.A Nos.692 and 693 of 2016 are preferred against the decrees and judgements in O.S.No.25 of 2010 and O.S.No.26 of 2010 respectively on the file of the very same Court. As the issues arose for consideration in the suits were closely interlinked, they were tried together, permitting the parties to let in evidence in O.S.No.111 of 2006, and disposed of by a common judgement. Since the suits from which the appeals arose were tried together and disposed of by a common judgement, these appeals are also disposed of by this common judgement. Parties and pr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
