IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Dr, Kauser Edappagath, J
THASLEEM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
RPFC 10/2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner faces civil imprisonment for failing to pay maintenance. (Para 2) |
| 2. counsel indicates lack of compliance from the petitioner. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directs issuance of non-bailable warrants for non-payment. (Para 4) |
ORDER
This revision petition has been filed challenging Annexure A2 order of maintenance passed by the Family Court, Malappuram in Crl.M.P.(Exe) No. 432 of 2023 in M.C.No. 400 of 2013, by which the petitioner was sentenced to imprisonment in Civil Prison for a period of 1260 days for non-payment of maintenance award passed against him. 2. As per the direction of this Court, the petitioner deposited Rs.40,000/- towards the maintenance arrears due. On such payment the petitioner was released from the jail. However, he was directed to mobilize the funds to pay the balance arrears of maintenance.
3. I have heard Sri.A.G.Sunil Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.M.P.Prasanth, the learned Public Prosecutor.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no response from the petitioner. The petitioner is not present also. The learned counsel submitted that he is relinquishing the vakalath. After getting a release order by paying a partial sum of Rs.40,000/-, the petitioner failed to comply with the direction of this Court to find out a way to mobilize the funds. Hence, the Family Court, Malappuram is directed to issue Non-Bailable Warrant against the petitioner, arrest him and send him to Civil Prison to undergo the balance period of imprisonment.
The revision petition is disposed of as above.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.