Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
PRAVEEN K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the accused and the charges against him. (Para 2) |
| 2. assessment of the statements regarding compromise. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's approval of the settlement and quashing of proceedings. (Para 4) |
| 4. final ruling on the application for quashment. (Para 5) |
O R D E R
A five Judges Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court inKulwinder Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Another [(2007) 4 CTC 769], framed broad guidelines as regards quashment of the criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code in respect of offences which are not compoundable in terms of Section 320 of the Code. One among the guidelines was that the offences against human body, other than murder and culpable homicide, may be permitted to be compounded, when the court is in a position to record a finding that the settlement between the parties is voluntary and fair. These guidelines were quoted with approval by a three Judges Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court inGian Singh v. State of Punjab and another [(2012) 10 SCC 303] . Similarly inNarinder Singh and Others v. State of Punjab [(2014) 6 SCC 466] , the Hon'ble Supreme Court has gone to the extent of sanctioning invocation of the inherent p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
