IN TIIE HIGII COURT OF KERAIA AT ERNAKUI.AM PEusENT THE HONotmz\BLE MR,dusTlcE a.s.DIAs mlmr, THE 8TH mr oF APRIL 2o22 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1944 MncA No. 2742 0F 2015 AGAINST THE ARARD DATED 28.10.2014 IN OP(MV)NO.161/2012 0F THE Ill AI]DITIomL MOTOR AcclDENT cIA"s TRIBURAL, ERNAKul.m4 AppELlnNTs/pETITloRERsi ARAVINDU, AGED 18 YEARS, s/o. RAGHAVAN, rmNGAIATH HOusE, CHARAMANGAIAM RARA, Mummn p. o. , ENJIKUZHI VII.RAGE, CHERTHAIA TALUK, AIAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

RA_-, jteED 82 ¥Eas, W/O. RAGHAVAN, ENGAIATH HOUSE, cHARmmNGAlm4 KARAMUHArmm p. O. , RANJIRTZHI VII.IAGE, CHERTHAIATALUK, AIAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

BY ADVS. SRI. P.M. JOSHI SIT.SIJI K.PAUL RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT :

THE MANAGER, NATIONAL INSUENCH cO.LTD .3RD pARTv CELL, AIA:I vlHAR, M.a..Roan,KoCHI - 16.

BY ADV SRI.M.A.GEORGE(B/O;NO M"O)

THIS iroTOR AcclDENT clAIus Appeal HAVING cchm up FOR A"ISsloN ON 08.04.2022, TIIE COURT ON THE SAiE DA:ir DELlvERED THE FOLLOENG:

M . A . C . A . No . 2742/2015 Dated this the 8th dry of April,2022 UDGME NT The appeal is filed by the petitioners in 0.P.(M.V)

No.161/2012 on the file of the Ill Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Emakulam, seeking enhancement of compensation.

2. On the suggestion made by this Court, the appellants and the respondent agreed to explore the possibility of settling their dispute through direct negotiation.

3. Pursuant to the settlement talks held in this Court, the above parties have arrived at an amicable settlement as per the terms and conditions in the Settlement Memo dated 18.03.2022, signed by the parties and countersigned by the respective counsel.

4. I have perused the Settlement Memo dated

18.03.2022 and found that the compensation amount agreed between the parties to be just and reasonable, M . A . C . A . No . 2742/2015 and that the settlement is in accordance with law.

In the result, the appeal is allowed as per the terms and conditions in the Settlement Memo dated

18.03.2022, which shall form part of the judgment. This Court places on record its appreciation for both the appellants as well as the respondent-insurer in harmoniously settling the dispute and putting an end to the litigation, and also for saving the precious judicial time.

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS,JUDGE DST/08.04.22 irF"ecoFryl PA.TOJudge •1 BEFORE THE HONOuRABLE' HiGH cOuRT oF KERALA AT ERNAmuLAm M,AC.A No. 2742 oF aei5 Aravindu ar]d another : Appellants/ Peffioners Vs The Manger.

NationaHr"rance co. Ltd : Fieapondent/ 2nd Pe5pondent FTL EMO j`®INTL.¥ FILED_FaR "E_ PAFtTIEs TIP THE iappEA The Appalfant and reapendenl insurance company have agree{I to seHe the claim jn the above numbered MACA arisen from OPMV. No 18lffll2 of the tylACT Emakulam Tor an addidonal compensaton of Rs 11, 47,000{Rupees eleven l~akh fidrty Seven ThoLisand Only}. Accordingly the above numbered MACA j5 se"ed for an addjfroal amount Of Rg. 11. 47fom{ RLjpees eleven Lath forty seven ' - Thousand Ouly}. \Ainich includes interest also @ 5% annum from the date of claim petition to this date.

Dated this the loth day of March. 2022 at Emakulam rmNAL "suRANCE Apellants : 1 } Aravind

2) Rathammajgiv Counsel for the Appellants Cbuns