SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 51753

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. SUNIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


ORDER

The petitioner is the second accused in the case registered as V.C.No.No.5/2014 by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB), Eastern Range, Kottayam.

2. The case against the petitioner and the other accused is registered under Section 13(1)(d)(ii) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short 'the P.C Act') and also under Sections 465, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegations in the first information report (Annexure-I) in the case are as follows: On 11.08.2014, a surprise check was conducted at the Collectorate, Idukki and the Taluk Office, Udumbanchola by the Deputy Collector (LR), Idukki in the presence of the Superintendent of Police, VACB, Eastern Range, Kottayam. It was revealed during the surprise check that no proper follow up action was taken in the Taluk Office, Udumbanchola till August, 2010 with regard to the illegal occupation of government land in Sy.No.87/1 of Chinnakanal Village and the unauthorized construction of buildings therein by M/s.Joys Group (A3) which had been detected by the Deputy Tahsildar, Task Force-III in March, 2008. On the basis of a court direction, Sri.V.R.Mohanan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top