Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
ANILKUMAR, THEJUS, UNNIKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case arose from private disputes amicably settled. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court received evidence of settlement from complainants. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court emphasized the importance of terminating prosecutions for harmonious relationships. (Para 6) |
O R D E R
The petitioners are the accused Nos.1 to 3 in C.C.No.34/2025 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Alappuzha, which arose out of Crime No.1070/2024 of Mararikkulam Police Station, Alappuzha. They face criminal prosecution for the commission of offences under Sections 296 (b), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 126(2) and
324(4) r/w Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
2. In the present petition, the petitioners would contend that the issue involved in this case, has been amicably settled with the de facto complainant, and hence the proceedings against them are liable to be quashed.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor representing the State of Kerala.
4. The de facto complainant, and the other persons aggrieved by the crime involved in this case, have filed affidavits before this Court, stating that the issue has been amicably settled with th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
