The court established that offenses under the Sand Act are bailable, and specific provisions of the BNS Act cannot be attracted for previously stated charges.

O R D E R

This bail application is filed under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short ‘ BNS S ’). 2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.849 of 2025 of Tirur Police Station, Malappuram, registered for the offences punishable under Section 3 03 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 (for short, ‘ ’), apart from Section 285 r/w Section 3 (5) of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act , 2001 (for short, ‘the Sand Act’).

3. According to the prosecution, the accused had, on

18.05.2025, transported river sand in a vehicle bearing registration No.KL-41-1318, thereby committing the offence alleged.

4. I have heard Sri. Sadiqali M., the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Smt.Sreeja V, the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. In the decision inMohammed Noufal v. State of Kerala [(2021) SCC Online Ker 5858] , this Court has held that Sections 20 and 23 of the Sand Act are bailable in nature. It was also observed that, when a special law covering the question of theft of river sand has been enacted, the offence under IPC for theft of river sand cannot be attracted. After the coming into force of BNS Act, the relevant provision for theft is Section 303 (2) of . Petitioner is alleged to have committed the offence under Section 303 (2) ie., theft of river sand.

6. In view of the decision inMohammed Noufal’s case (supra), the offence under Section 303 (2) of BNS cannot be attracted. Since the remaining offences alleged against the petitioner are bailable, petitioner’s apprehension of arrest in connection with a non-

bailable offence does not subsist.

Accordingly, the bail application is closed.