Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Dr, Kauser Edappagath, J
SANTHOSHKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
DR. T.A. HABEEB – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction under n.i. act confirmed in complaints against dishonored checks. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court recognizes the request for extended time to pay fines imposed. (Para 4) |
[Crl.Rev.Pet. Nos.32/2025 & 37/2025]
ORDER
These Criminal Revision Petitions have been filed challenging the concurrent finding of conviction and sentence in two proceedings initiated under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short ‘the N.I. Act’) and disposed of by a common judgment.
2. The petitioner is the accused and the 1st respondent is the complainant in S. T. Nos.346/2017 and 33/2018 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court – I, Perinthalmanna (for short ‘the trial court’). Those cases arose out of two private complaints filed by the 1st respondent against the petitioner under Section 142 of the N. I. Act. The trial court tried both the cases together.
3. After the trial, the petitioner was found guilty in both the cases and he was convicted for the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. He was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment till the rising of the court and to pay a
6 fine of ₹1,63,125/- (Rupees One lakh sixty three thousand one hundre
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
