The petitioner calls into question the correctness of Ext.P5 order of the learned Family Court, Punalur, through which, I.A.No.12/2025 in O.P.(Oth) No.2151/2023 has been allowed. 2. The above mentioned interim application had been filed by the respondent – her now estranged husband, seeking that a particular voice recording between the parties be referred to forensic examination, under the aegis of the Forensic Science Laboratory. The learned Family Court accepted the plea of the respondent and issued the impugned order, which is now assailed by the petitioner, as being illegal and unlawful.

3. Sri.Krishnakumar – learned counsel for the petitioner, argued that, even going by the affidavit filed in support of I.A.No.12/2025 (which has been produced as Ext.P3), it is evident that no reasons have been stated by the respondent to seek that the voice recording be subjected to forensic evaluation; and that this is extremely important to have been noted, since