Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, J
Petitioner – Appellant
Versus
Kerala State Electricity Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims possession of government puramboke land for farming. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court directs the case to be heard by the appropriate bench. (Para 3 , 5 , 7) |
| 3. petitioner seeks to implead additional respondents regarding land ownership. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. legal requirements for pleadings in writ petitions emphasized. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. petitioner's construction on disputed land raises encroachment issues. (Para 12 , 21) |
| 6. prohibitory orders in place for construction in munnar region. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 7. forest officer's authority to prevent encroachment and protect wildlife. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 8. writ of mandamus requires a statutory duty and legal right. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 9. writ petition dismissed; no relief granted to petitioner. (Para 27) |
JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioner, who claims to be in possession and enjoyment of 16.47 Ares (40.68 cents) of Government Puramboke in Sy.No.34/1 of Chinnakanal Village from 14.05.2024, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India , seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 4th respondent Range Forest Officer, Devikulam Range, to issue No Objection Certificate, forthwith to t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
