IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PARAMESWARAN – Appellant
Versus
SREEKRISHNAPURAM TEMPLE COMMITTEE – Respondent
RSA 152/2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM TUESDAY, THE
4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025 / 15TH MAGHA, 1946 RSA NO. 152 OF 2020 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.11.2019 IN AS NO.26 OF
2014 OF ADDITIONAL SUB COURT,IRINJALAKUDA ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.12.2013 IN OS NO.1520 OF 2007 OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT ,IRINJALAKUDA APPELLANTS/1ST AND 2ND RESPONDENTS/1ST & 2ND PLAINTIFFS:
1 PARAMESWARAN AGED 75 YEARS S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, PUTHENVEETIL MOOKANI HOUSE, ALAGAPPANAGAR P.O., AMBALLUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT
2 SARALADEVI AGED 63 YEARS W/O. PARAMESWARAN, PUTHENVEETIL MOOKANI HOUSE, ALAGAPPANAGAR P.O., AMBALLUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT BY ADVS.
K.S.RAJESH SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS & 3RD PLAINTIFF:
1 SREEKRISHNAPURAM TEMPLE COMMITTEE, ALAGAPPANAGAR P.O., AMBALLUR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK REP. BY ITS TRUSTEE NO. RAJEEVAN, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O. NANIKUTTY AMMA, NELLANATT HOUSE, ALAGAPPANAGAR P.O.
PIN - 680 302 THRISSUR DISTRICT
2 HARIDAS AGED 67 YEARS S/O. RATNAVALLY AMMA, KIPULLY HOUSE, ALAGAPPANAGAR P.O.
PIN - 680 302 THRISSUR DISTRICT
3 SUNIL AGED 50 YEARS S/O. AMMINI AMMA, KARIPERY HOUSE, ALAGAPPANAGAR P.O.
PIN - 680 302 THRISSUR DISTRICT
4 SANTHOSH AGED 50 YEARS S/O. SUBHADRA AMMA, THEKKUT HOUSE, ALAGAPPANAGAR P.O.
PIN - 680 302 THRISSUR DISTRICT
5 MUKUNDAN AGED 72 YEARS S/O. RAMAN PILLAI, THENATTIL HOUSE, ALAGAPPANAGAR P.O.
PIN - 680 302 THRISSUR DISTRICT
6 VISWANATHAN AGED 70 YEARS S/O. KRISHNA IYER, PUNCHAMI, ALAGAPPANAGAR P.O.
PIN - 680 302 THRISSUR DISTRICT
7 SOMAN AGED 64 YEARS S/O. GOVINDANKUTTY MENON, KOTTANADU HOUSE, ALAGAPPANAGAR, AMBALLUR VILLAGE, PIN - 680 302 THRISSUR DISTRICT BY ADVS.
SRI.K.S.BHARATHAN SRI.RAJESH CHAKYAT SRI.ABEL ANTONY SRI.CHRISTINE MATHEW THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.02.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
1. The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the appellants are not pressing the Appeal. The first appellant has filed a memo dated 22.01.2025 to that effect.
2. Memo recorded.
3. Accordingly, the R.S.A. is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM JUDGE Shg/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.