IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
, J
SUNIL KUMAR H – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Applications | BA No.427/2025 | BA No.831/2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. destruction of property is a significant concern in criminal law. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. bail applications involve serious allegations of assault and property damage. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. imposing a deposit as a bail condition can deter property damage. (Para 8 , 18) |
| 4. bail is granted with conditions including deposit amounts. (Para 21) |
ORDER
Destruction of property is a form of violence. Nowadays, when criminal offences are committed, there is a tendency to damage the private properties of the victims, like their residential houses, household items, ofÏce items, etc. If a physical hurt is caused, it can be cured on some occasions by medication. But the destruction of property can be compensated only through money. However, the victims in criminal cases have to wait a long time to get compensation. If damages are caused to private properties by the assailants, can a condition be imposed to deposit the damages assessed by the Police as a condition for granting bail, subject to the result of the final decision in the investigation and also by a competent court, is the question to be decided in this case.
2. I will narrate the facts in these bail applications separately. BA No.427/2025 is filed by the accused in Crime No.36/2025 of Mala Police Station, Thrissur District. The above case is registered against the petitioners alleging offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 110 , 333 , 324(5) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNS ). The prosecution case is that, on 04/01/2025 at about 8:30 pm, while the defacto complainant and his brother were standing in front of their house near the shop of his father, accused Nos.1 to 4, who were having enmity with the defacto complainant, assaulted the father of the defacto complainant. When the defacto complainant intervened, the accused assaulted the defacto complainant and his brother Amarjith using their hands. When the defacto complainant, his brother and his father were trying to escape from the place, the accused attacked them using an iron rod and also damaged the glass of the shop attached to the house of the defacto complainant. It is also alleged that several glass vessels and the articles in the shop were damaged. According to the prosecution, they sustained a loss of about Rs. One Lakh. Hence it is alleged that the accused committed the offence.
3. The petitioners in BA No.831/2025 are the accused in Crime No.735/2024 of Ranny Police Station, Pathanamthitta. The above case is registered against the petitioners alleging offences punishable under Sections 296, 333, 118(1), 115(2) , 324(5), 189(1), 189(2), 191(2), 191(3) and 190 of BNS . The prosecution case is that the accused, along with two identifiable persons, trespassed into the residence of the first informant on 05/10/2024, at 9.30 pm, and assaulted the defacto complainant, his parents and his brother using a weapon, like an iron rod, damaged two motorcycles and two mobile phones, demolished walls, etc. It is alleged that the defacto complainant sustained a loss of Rs. 3,36,000/-.
4. These bail applications are filed apprehending arrest by the petitioners in Crime No.36/2025 of Mala Police Station and Crime No.735/2024 of Ranny Police Station.
5. As per the prosecution allegation, it is clear that, While committing criminal offences, the petitioners also committed mischief and the offence under Section 324 (5) of BNS is also alleged. Section 324 of deals with “mischief”. Whoever with intent to cause, or knowing that he is likely to cause, wrongful loss or damage to the public or to any person, causes the destruction of any property, or any such change in any property or in the situation thereof as destroys or diminishes its value or utility, or affects it injuriously, commits “mischief”. Section 324 (2) of says that whoever commits mischief shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or wit
In Re: Destruction of Public & Private Properties v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Kodungallur Film Society and Another v. Union of India and Others
Ramratan @ Ramaswaroop Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Ramesh Kumar Vs. State of NCT of Delhi
Hemachandran M.T. @ Kamalesh and Others v. Sub Inspector of Police and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.