SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 21124

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
P.P.DAMODHARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 21571 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.MADHU, SRI.VRINDA T.S., SRI.AISWARYA JAYAPAL, SRI.C.R.SARADAMANI, SRI.RENJISH S. MENON
For the Respondents: SMT. DEEPA NARAYANAN. SR. GP.

The definition of 'family' under Section 2(fb) of the Kerala Stamp Act, 1959, is inclusive of all heirs.

Headnote:The judgment addresses the legality of a partition deed's registration, wherein the inclusion of great-grandchildren as heirs was contested based on the definition of 'family' under Section 2(fb) of the Kerala Stamp Act, 1959. The Court found that this definition is inclusive, allowing for the registration of partition deeds involving such parties. The court based its findings on precedent established in Janu K.K vs. Sub Registrar, Kadirur and Another (2015) and ultimately ruled in favor of the petitioner, instructing the registration of the deed upon compliance with statutory requirements.

Table of Content
1. interpretation of family in relation to property inheritance. (Para 1 , 2)
2. writ petition's outcome permitting deed registration. (Para 3)

T.R.RAVI.J -------------------------------------------------------

WP(C) No.21571 of 2023 --------------------------------------------------------

Dated this the 10th day of February, 2025 JUDGMENT The registration of Ext.P1 partition deed executed among the legal heirs of late Vayalil Raman and P.P.Manikkam has been refused stating that all the members who have been included in the partition deed do not come within the definition of ‘family’ contained in Section 2 (fb) of the Kerala Stamp Act, 1959 .

2. The objection is regarding the inclusion of great grand children. This Court has in Janu K.K vs. Sub Registrar, Kadirur and Another [ 2015 (1) KHC 315 ] held that merely for the reason that great grand children of original owner of the property are also parties to the document, it cannot be contended that the document would not come within the scope of Article 42 of the Schedule and that the definition of the word ‘family’ contained in Section 2 (fb) of the Kerala Stamp Act, 1959 . is an inclusive definition which includes all parties who are co-owners and are successors-in-interest of the owner of the property.

3. In view of the categorical pronouncement, the petitioner is entitled to succeed. The writ petition is allowed. Exts.P2 and P3 are set aside. There will be a direction to the 3rd respondent to register the original of the partition deed as and when the same is presented on the petitioner complying with all the requirements under the Registration Act and Rules.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top