SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 23068

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SARIKA.S – Appellant
Versus
RADHAMMA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The plaintiff in O.S.No.211/2007 on the file of the Munsiff’s Court, Mavelikara, in the first appellate stage seeks permission to withdraw the Original Suit with liberty to institute a fresh suit on the same cause of action or on a different cause of action.

2. The plaintiff instituted the suit seeking a declaration of easement right by prescription over the plaint schedule property and for consequential injunction against the defendants. The trial Court dismissed the suit, holding that the plaintiff is not entitled to a right of easement by prescription over the property. The plaintiff challenged the decree in A.S.No.3/2010 before the Additional District Court, Mavelikara. She filed I.A.No.779/2013 in the Appeal Suit under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC , seeking permission to withdraw the suit with liberty to institute a fresh suit.

3. As per the order dated 07.11.2013, the Appellate Court allowed the I.A. subject to the payment of Rs.4,000/- as costs to the defendants. The defendants thereafter filed I.A.No.782/2013, seeking review of the order under Section 114 and Order XLVII Rule 1 of the CPC . The review petition was allowed, and the order dated 07.11.2013 was reviewed. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top