Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. Sudha, J
ABDUL SALAM – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellants challenge conviction for sexual offences. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court's final findings and dismissal of appeal. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. arguments regarding the reliability of victim's testimony. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's analysis of witness testimonies and medical evidence. (Para 13 , 15) |
J U D G M E N T
In this appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. the appellants who are accused nos.1 and 2 in S.C.No.291/2011 and S.C. No. 251/2012 on the file of the Court of Session, Manjeri challenges the conviction entered and sentence passed against them for the offence punishable under Section 377 IPC .
2. The prosecution case is that the accused persons two in number in furtherance of their common intention to commit carnal intercourse against the order of nature, on 19/05/2010 at 01:45 p.m. took PW5, a boy aged 16 years in their car, forcibly made him drink alcohol, took him to a desolate place and had carnal intercourse against the order of nature. Hence, the accused persons as per the final report/charge sheet are alleged to have committed the offences punishable under Section s 363 and 377 read with Section 34 IPC .
3. Crime no.209/2010, Malappuram police stati
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
