SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 23743

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SASIKUMAR.V – Appellant
Versus
SAJI – Respondent
Con.Case(C) 1034/2024



2025:KER:5204 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2025 / 3RD MAGHA, 1946 CON.CASE(C) NO. 1034 OF 2024 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.03.2023 IN WP(C) NO.35838 OF 2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN W.P.:

SASIKUMAR.V., AGED 56 YEARS S/O. K.K. VASUDEVAN, KUNNUMKALTHARA HOUSE, THIRUMALABHAGAM P.O., KUTHIATHOD, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA., PIN - 688540 BY ADVS.

JAMES ABRAHAM (VILAYAKATTU)

AMMU ASHOKAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 5 IN W.P:

1 SAJI AGE AND FATHER’S NAME IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, KUTHIATHOD GRAMA PANCHAYAT, THURAVOOR P.O., ALAPPUZHA., PIN - 688532

2 AZAD ABDUL KALAM AGE AND FATHER’S NAME IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KUTHIATHOD POLICE STATION, THURAVOOR, ALAPPUZHA., PIN - 688533

3 BIJU K.G AGE AND FATHER’S NAME IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, MINI CIVIL STATION, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT., PIN - 688524

4 RAJESWARI AGE AND FATHER’S NAME IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, CHAIRMAN, TRAFFIC REGULATORY COMMITTEE, 2025:KER:5204 KUTHIATHOD GRAMA PANCHAYAT, THURAVOOR P.O., ALAPPUZHA., PIN - 688532 BY ADVS.

R.RAJPRADEEP BRIJESH MOHAN(K/1851/1999)

SREEDEVI S.(K/767/2020)

OTHER PRESENT:

GP - RIYAL DEVASSY THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.01.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

2025:KER:5204 VIJU ABRAHAM, J.

.................................................................

Con.Case (C) No.1034 of 2024 in W.P.(C) No.35838 of 2022 ................................................................. Dated this the 23rd day of January, 2025

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the direction in the judgment has been complied with.

Recording the same the contempt of court case is closed.

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE cks

2025:KER:5204 APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1034/2024 RESPONDENT ANNEXURES Annexure R1(a) A true copy of the minutes of Meeting of the TRC on 16/06/2023 Annexure R1(b) A true copy of the minutes of meetinf of TRC on 27/06/2023 Annexure R1(c) A true copy of the minutes of Meeting of TRC on 19/09/2023 Annexure R1(d) A true copy of the minutes of meeting of TRC on 18/04/2024 Annexure R1(e) A true copy of the photograph showing the present position as on 27/05/2024 Annexure R1(f) A true copy of the minutes of the Traffic Regulatory Committee dated

13/01/2025 Annexure R1(g) A true copy of the photographs taken on

21/01/2025 showing that no vehicle is parked in front of the Petitioners building

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top