IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
LINTO – Appellant
Versus
CHRISTIAN MARRIAGE REGISTRAR AND SUB REGISTRAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court examines documents supporting petitioners' application. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court finds evidence adequate for marriage processing. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 27th day of January, 2025 The writ petition is filed to direct the respondent to process Ext.P1 notice submitted by the petitioners to get their marriage solemnized under the Cochin Christian Civil Marriage Act , 1095 (M.E) (for short ‘the Act’).
2. The petitioners are Christians by religion. The
1st petitioner is residing in the erstwhile Cochin State and is governed by the provisions of the Act. The 1st petitioner desires to get married to the 2nd petitioner, who is a national of Nepal. The petitioners are living together for the last one year. They had submitted Ext.P1 application before the respondent to get their marriage solemnized as per the provisions of the Act. However, the respondent has refused to accept the application on the ground that the 2nd petitioner has not produced a single status certificate. In fact, the 2nd petitioner has produced Ext.P2 marital status certificate issued by her Municipality in Nepal and has sworn Ext.P3 notarized affidavit stating that, she is a spinster
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.