Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Easwaran S., J
State – Appellant
Versus
Claimants – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appeals arise from a judgment concerning land acquisition for public purpose. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. state's arguments focus on procedural issues and the need for evidence. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court emphasizes the importance of fair compensation and adherence to established procedures. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 12) |
| 4. court affirms the reference court's decision as just, despite procedural criticisms. (Para 10 , 13) |
| 5. final ruling dismisses the appeals, maintaining the compensation awarded. (Para 14) |
J U D G M E N T
[LA.App. Nos.230/2020, 72/2021, 31/2021, 140/2021, 244/2020, 4/2021, 3/2021, 2/2021, 21/2021]
Easwaran S., J.
These appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 6.2.2020 rendered by the II Additional District Court, Kollam in various references arising under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (in short 'Act 30 of 2013').
2. The acquisition relates to an extent of 00.4010, 00.0511, 004388, 00.4410, 00.3260, 00.3915, 00.4926, 00.1012 and 0.2365 hectares of land, respectively, situated in Vadakkevila village of Kollam Taluk for the purpose of establishment of water supply and tr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
