IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
AMIT RAWAL, J
SHRI. SANKAR N.S – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review application due to conflicting decisions. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT AMIT RAWAL, J.
The Central Administrative Tribunal allowed O.A.No.604/2023 vide order dated 27.09.2024. However, review has been filed by the Union of India, as certain documents, particularly the order of the Bangalore Bench, has not been taken into consideration. The Tribunal, vide order under review dated 09.01.2025 in R.A.No.19/2024 passed the following order and restored the OA:
“This is a Review Application filed by the respondents in the Original Application seeking to review the order dated 27.09.2024 in the Original Application.
2. The of the crux arguments of the Review Applicants/respondents in the Original Application is that at the time of final hearing of the O.A., copy of order of Bangalore Bench of this Tribunal - Annexure-RA2 in OA 632/2023 was placed before this Tribunal. But the Court failed to make mention about the said decision, nor relied on it and allowed the O.A. taking a contra view. According to the Review Applicants, it is a decision of a co-ordinate Bench of equal strength, whereunder the O.A. seeking self same relief was dismissed by the Bangalore Bench. Challenge in both
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.