SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 24440

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
AMIT RAWAL, J
SHRI. SANKAR N.S – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents:

Table of Content
1. review application due to conflicting decisions. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT AMIT RAWAL, J.

The Central Administrative Tribunal allowed O.A.No.604/2023 vide order dated 27.09.2024. However, review has been filed by the Union of India, as certain documents, particularly the order of the Bangalore Bench, has not been taken into consideration. The Tribunal, vide order under review dated 09.01.2025 in R.A.No.19/2024 passed the following order and restored the OA:

“This is a Review Application filed by the respondents in the Original Application seeking to review the order dated 27.09.2024 in the Original Application.

2. The of the crux arguments of the Review Applicants/respondents in the Original Application is that at the time of final hearing of the O.A., copy of order of Bangalore Bench of this Tribunal - Annexure-RA2 in OA 632/2023 was placed before this Tribunal. But the Court failed to make mention about the said decision, nor relied on it and allowed the O.A. taking a contra view. According to the Review Applicants, it is a decision of a co-ordinate Bench of equal strength, whereunder the O.A. seeking self same relief was dismissed by the Bangalore Bench. Challenge in both

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top