Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
KURIACHAN CHACKO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners are accused in multiple cases arising from the same transaction. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding the quashing of firs based on concurrent trials. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observation on the distinct nature of offenses and necessity for separate trials. (Para 6) |
| 4. court's reasoning on why the firs cannot be quashed. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition (crl) is filed with following prayers :
a. “Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other Writ, Order or direction quashing Ext. P7 & P7(a), the First Information Report and the Final Report in Crime No. 672/2006 of Central Police Station, Ernakulam pending as CC 850/2011l of the CJM Court, Ernakulam; Ext. P8 & P8(a), the First Information Report and the Final Report in Crime No. 460/2006 of East Police Station, Kollam pending as CC 295/2017 of the CJM Court, Kollam; Ext.P9 & P9(a), the First Information Report and the Final Report in Crime No. 195/2006 of Kazhakuttam Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram CC 294/2017 of the CJM Court, Thiruvananthapuram; Ext. P10, the First Information Report in Crime No. 133/2006 of Museum Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram along with the Final Report, which is pend
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
