HIGH COURT OF KERALA
B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J
KUTTIKKATTIL UMMER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
ORDER
The accused in C.C.No. 195 of 2002 on the files of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-I, Manjeri, filed this revision petition challenging the concurrent finding of conviction and sentence passed by the courts below under Sections 279 and 338 IPC.
2. Heard.
3. The prosecution allegation is that on
17.04.2002 at about 10.45 a.m., the revision petitioner drove a jeep bearing registration No.TN 37/S 5077 along the public road in a rash and negligent manner so as to endanger human life and when it reached at Kavungapara, it hit against the motor cycle ridden by PW1 and as a consequence, PW1 was thrown to the road and he sustained injuries.
4. Before the trial court, PW1 to PW9 were examined and Exts.P1 to P6 were marked for the prosecution. No evidence was adduced on the side of the revision petitioner.
5. The courts below correctly appreciated the oral and documentary evidence adduced by the prosecution and concurrently found that the revision petitioner committed the offence under Sections 279 and 338 IPC, repelling the contentions of the revision petitioner. No circumstance is available before the court to indicate that the concurrent finding or the appreciation of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.