ORDER

The revision petitioner is the accused in C.C. No. 80 of 2006 on the files of the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Manjeri.

2. The trial Court convicted the revision petitioner under Section 332 of IPC and sentenced him thereunder to rigorous imprisonment for six month. The appeal filed against the said conviction and sentence was dismissed. Aggrieved by the said conviction and sentence, this Revision Petition has been filed.

3. Heard both sides.

4. The prosecution allegation is that on 26-8-2005 at about 11.15 p.m. the revision petitioner entered into the office of Edavanna Police Station and caused hurt to PW3 who was doing official duty at that time and thereby deterred PW3 from discharging his official duties.

5. Before the trial court, PW1 to PW6 were examined and Exts. P1 to P4 were marked for the prosecution. No evidence was adduced on the side of the defence.

6. PW3 is the injured in this case. He had given evidence in tune with the prosecution case. PW2 is another Police Constable who also supported the evidence of PW3 in all material aspects. PW6 was the doctor who examined PW3 and issued Ext. P4 wound certificate. Apart from PW2 and PW3, there was no other occur