SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Online)(KER) 14876

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J
VARGHESE PAUL – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY TAHSILDAR – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:

“i. Call for the records leading to Exhibits P2 and P3 and quash the same by issuance of a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction.

ii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ in the like nature Direction or order commanding the 1st respondent to hear and act upon Exhibit P4 within a time limit that may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court, before proceeding further with Revenue Recovery proceedings;

iii) to pass such other orders fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and that may be prayed hereafter.”

2. When the matter came up for consideration before this Court on 06.08.2014, the following interim order was passed.

“Govt. Pleader as well as Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent will get instruction. Post on 28.8.2014. Meanwhile, there will be an interim stay against further steps of recovery pursuant to Exts.P2 and P3 notices subject to condition of the petitioner remitting a sum of Rs.75,000/- (Rupees seventy five thousand only) on or before

26.08.2014.”

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the condition imposed by this Court has already be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top