HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.HARILAL, J
MUTHU KOYA AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
NARGEES BEEVI AND ANOTHER – Respondent
ORDER
The revision petitioners are the decree holders in O.S.
No.2/2000 on the files of the Munsiff's Court, Androth as well as the petitioners in E.P.No.2/07 filed therein. In the above case, a decree was passed against the respondents/defendants restraining them from evicting the plaintiffs or interfering with the right of residence in the House No.C4-244 situated in the plaint schedule property. The above E.P. was filed under Order XXI Rule 32(1), (2) and (5) of the Code of Civil Procedure on the allegation that on 8-2-2007 the respondents/defendants intentionally demolished the decree schedule house, while the petitioners were away from the house, which has been used by the petitioners and situated in the plaint schedule property. That apart, the judgment debtors sold their household articles worth Rs.75,000/- belong to the decree holders and thus the judgment debtors willfully violated the decree of the court. The act of the judgment debtors is clear disobedience of the order of the court and violation of the decree passed in O.S. No.2/2000.
2. The respondents denied the demolition of the building and sale of the articles belonged to the decree holders. According to them, the d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.