SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(KER) 28226

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J
ITI LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This writ petition raises three important questions: (i) Whether in the light of the amendment to Part VII of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act'), acquisition for a Government company is covered by the provisions of the said Part and an agreement executed between such a Government Company and the Government will be void; (ii) whether the agreement is violative of Section 20 of the Contract Act and if so, it is void; and (iii) whether the agreement could be saved in the light of Section 21 of the Contract Act.

2. The necessary facts for the disposal of the writ petition are the following: The petitioner is the ITI Limited, Bangalore, a Government of India company. For expanding the Palakkad Unit, the Company requested the Government of Kerala to acquire the property having 100 acres in extent in 1987. The request was considered under Part VII of the Act. Exts.P2 to P6 are the copies of awards passed in the land acquisition proceedings. The Company paid an amount of Rs.2.5 crores to satisfy the awards. On completion of the proceedings of acquisition Ext.P7 agreement was executed between the Company and the Government on 17.7.1987 imposing certain conditions

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top