HIGH COURT OF KERALA
N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J
ANIL KUMAR AGED 32 SON OF BHASKARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
O R D E R
Petitioner's counsel absent. No representation. Dismissed for non-
prosecution.
02-02-2012 SD/- N.K.BALAKRISHNAN,JUDGE /TRUE COPY/
P.S.TO.JUDGE sts P. D. RAJAN, J.
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
Crl. R.P. No. 1457 of 2002 =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
Dated this the 9th day of April, 2013 JUDGMENT Revision petitioners were convicted by the trial court U/s. 143, 147, 148, 324 and 307 r/w section 149 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for different periods and also directed to pay fine under the aforesaid sections. The substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently. An appeal filed was partly allowed by the Additional Sessions Court, Alappuzha confirming the conviction and sentence passed U/s. 324 and 307 IPC and set aside the conviction and sentence U/s. 143, 147and 148 IPC. Challenging the said judgment this criminal revision petition has been preferred.
2. The prosecution case is that on 20.10.1997 at
4.30 p.m. the accused along with four identifiable persons formed themselves into an unlawful assembly carrying deadly weapons like sword stick and iron bars near the Thanneermukkom School junction and inflicted injuries on Crl.
Sumer Sinbh Umedsinh Rajput @ Sumersinh V. State of Gujarat
Makan Jivan and others V State of Gujarat
Jai Narain Mishra and others V. The State of Bihar
Tameshwar Sahi and others v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Shiva Sankara Pandey and others v. State of Bihar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.