Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, J
Anil K. Narendran – Appellant
Versus
Kerala State Co-operative Bank – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appellant invoked writ jurisdiction for relief against bank proceedings. (Para 1) |
| 2. the learned single judge allowed installment payments but denied staying proceedings. (Para 2) |
| 3. the court emphasized the necessity of a statutory duty for issuing a writ of mandamus. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. the appeal was dismissed as the appellant failed to comply with repayment conditions. (Para 19) |
JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The appellant filed W.P.(C)No.46613 of 2024, invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India , seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 3rd respondent District Collector, Kollam, to consider Ext.P5 representation dated 13.12.2024 made by OGTM Skills Academy, in which he is the Managing Partner. The appellant-petitioner has also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding the 4th respondent Manager, Kerala State Co-operative Bank, Nilamel, to keep in abeyance the proceedings in Ext.P4 notice dated 04.12.2024 issued by the Advocate Commissioner, which was one issued pursuant to Ext.P3 order dated 18.11.2024 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kollam in M.C.No.1067 of 2024, a p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
