Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALEE KRISHNA S., J
R.SASIDHARAN – Appellant
Versus
TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks documents related to past litigation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents argue the petition lacks basis and evidence. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court observes vagueness in petitioner's allegations. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. mandamus issuance requires established legal rights. (Para 7) |
| 5. legal precedents clarify conditions for mandamus. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. writ petition dismissed due to insufficient grounds. (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner seeking a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 to 4 to give him the copy of document No.109/1122 ME of SRO Ambalappuzha and the plaint copy, decree and judgment in O.S. No. 43 of 1952 on the file of the Munisff’s Court, Haripad.
2. Going by the averments in the writ petition, the property covered in document bearing No.109/1122 ME of SRO Ambalappuzha belongs to the family of the petitioner, and it relates to the properties of Trippakudam Devaswom falling under the Mavelikkara and Haripad Group of Travancore Devaswom Board. The original of that document is in the custody of the 1st respondent, Travancore Devaswom Board. Some litigations
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
