Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
UNNIKRISHNAN M M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of fraud and resultant signing of non-intentional documents. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. notice issuance by the magistrate without proper inquiry is unaddressed. (Para 4) |
| 3. court underscores the necessity of enquiring prior to proceeding with the complaint. (Para 5 , 6) |
JUDGMENT
The above original petition is filed with following prayers :
(i) “Set aside Exhibit P2 the proceedings dtd.28.11.2024 in CMP No.8164 of 2024 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate III, Thrissur;
(ii) Direct the Judicial First Class Magistrate III, Thrissur to order investigation under 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 in CMP No.8164 of 2024.
(iii) Dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents (iv) Issue such other orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper.” [sic]
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the proceedings dated 28.11.2024 in CMP No. 8164/2024 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-III, Thrissur. The petitioner is the complainant in CMP No. 8164/2024. According to the petitioner, he is a 69 year old illiterate person. He was defrauded and misrepresented by the accused in making him believe that he was affixing his sign
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
