The court mandated expeditious handling of petitioner's revision request regarding staff fixation, ensuring due process is observed.

JUDGMENT

1. The present writ petition has been filed for the following prayers.

a)Call for the records leading to Exhibit P.5 and set aside the same as legally and factually unsustainable;

b)Issue writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the 5th respondent to revise the staff fixation orders for the year 2023-24, sanctioning 11 divisions in UP Section taking into account effective strength of students and availability of 11 class rooms;

c)Declare that the petitioner-school is entitled to be sanctioned with 3 additional division taking into the account students strength in the academic year 2023-24 as per Rule 12(6) of Chapter XXIII of KER and there no need for additional class rooms for languages;

d)Such other reliefs that the Hon’ble Court deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s revision in Exhibit P-6 is pending before the 1^st respondent and he would limit his prayer for expeditious disposal of the revision in Exhibit P-6.

3. Considering the limited prayer made in this writ petition for early disposal of the revision in Exhibit P-6 filed by the petitioner, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the 1^st respondent to take up the revision filed by the petitioner in Exhibit P-6 and decide the same expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months. The petitioner should be afforded an opportunity of hearing before taking a final decision on the revision in Exhibit P-6.