IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JOSE GEORGE @ JOBIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. civil revision for conviction under ni act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. limited revisional jurisdiction discussed. (Para 3 , 4) |
ORDER
The above Criminal Revision Petition is filed seeking the following relief:
“to allow this Criminal Revision Petition and therein set aside the judgment dated 26.04.2024 on the files of the Additional District & Sessions Court111, Pathanamthitta in Criminal Appeal No. 91 /2018 confirming the conviction and sentence imposed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court 11, Ranny in S. T. No.22/2017 and therein acquit the accused of the offence under Section
138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,1881.”
[SIC]
2. This Criminal Revision Petition is filed against the concurrent finding of conviction and sentence imposed on the Revision petitioner by the trial court and the appellate court. The Revision petitioner is the accused in S.T. No.22/2017 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Ranny. It is a prosecution initiated against the petitioner alleging offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short 'NI Act'). The learned Magistrate after a full fledged trial found that the petitioner is gui
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.