Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. Muhamed Mustaque, Kauser Edappagath, JJ
... – Appellant
Versus
.... – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of matrimonial appeals and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. grounds for dissolution of marriage due to cruelty and adultery. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. court's analysis of evidence regarding adultery. (Para 7 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. importance of condonation in matrimonial disputes. (Para 13 , 15) |
| 5. false complaints as a basis for mental cruelty. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 6. wife's claims for recovery of gold and money; examination of trust. (Para 24 , 26 , 29) |
| 7. welfare of the child as the primary consideration in guardianship. (Para 30 , 31 , 33) |
JUDGMENT
Mat.Appeal Nos.370/2015, 540/2015, & 585/2015
Dated this the 6th day of August, 2021
Kauser Edappagath, J.
The husband who is the appellant in all the above appeals challenges three verdicts passed against him by two different Family Courts in three separate proceedings.
2. For the sake of brevity, we refer the parties to as “husband” and “wife”. OP No.389/2013, on the file of the Family Court, Muvattupuzha, was instituted by the husband for dissolution of marriage on the ground of adultery and cruelty. It was dismissed as per the judgment dated 7/2/2015. Mat.Appeal No.370/2015 has been filed challenging the said judgment. OP N
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
