SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 26474

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
MAHESH @ KANNAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Application No. 7950 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri.M.R.Sarin
For the Respondents: Smt.Sreeja V.

Harbouring an offender is a bailable offence, and continued detention is unnecessary if the accused has been in custody for a significant period.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 483 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 126(2), 103(1), 61(2)(a), 249, 49, and 3(5) - Bail application filed by the petitioner, accused of harbouring an offender, claiming it is a bailable offence. Court noted that the petitioner was arrested on 18.05.2025 and has been in custody since then. (Paras 2, 5, 7)

(B) Bail - Nature of offence - The petitioner’s involvement is limited to harbouring an offender, which is bailable, and the court found continued detention unnecessary. (Paras 5, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was accused in a murder conspiracy where he allegedly harboured the main offender post-incident. The prosecution contended serious allegations against him while the defence argued for bail based on the nature of the offence.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the nature of the alleged offence justified bail, given it was bailable and the petitioner had been in custody for an extended period.

Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted bail considering the nature of the offence and the duration of custody.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that since the offence of harbouring an offender is bailable and the petitioner had been in custody since May, continued detention was not necessary.

Result: Bail application allowed with specific conditions.

Table of Content
1. details of the charges against the petitioner. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments presented by both parties regarding bail. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's analysis of the bail conditions. (Para 7 , 8)

ORDER

This bail application is filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short ‘ BNSS ’).

2. Petitioner is the 5th accused in Crime No.993 of 2025 of Nedumangad Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126 (2) , 103(1) , 61(2)(a) , 249 , 49 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 (for short ‘ BNS ’).

3. According to the prosecution, on 11.05.2025, pursuant to a scufÒe between accused Nos.1 & 2 and the deceased, a conspiracy was entered into between accused Nos.1 to 4 to commit murder and thereafter accused Nos.1 to 3 restrained the deceased and the 1st accused stabbed him on his chest and thereby committed the offences alleged. The prosecution further alleges that the 1st accused left the place on a motor cycle kept by the 4th accused nearby the place of incident, while the 5th accused harboured the accused after the commission of offence. The petitioner was arrested on 18.05.2025 and has been in custody since then.

4. Heard Sri.M.R.Sarin, the learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Smt.Sreeja V., the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the only offence alleged against the petitioner is under Section 249 of BNS , i.e., harbouring of an offender, which is a bailable offence. However, since he was roped in along with accused Nos.1 to 4, he was arrested on 18.05.2025 and has been in custody since then. Considering the nature of offence attributed against the petitioner, he ought to be released on bail.

6. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and submitted that since the allegations against the petitioner are serious, he ought not to be released on bail at this juncture.

7. On a perusal of the prosecution case, it is noticed that the allegation against the petitioner falls within the realm of the offence of harbouring of an offender. Section 249 of BNS is a bailable offence.

8. Considering the circumstances that petitioner was arrested on 18.05.2025 and also since the main overt act alleged against him can only fall within the category of a bailable offence, I am of the view that the continued detention is not required. Therefore, petitioner ought to be released on bail.

In the result, this bail application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(a) Petitioner shall be released on bail on him executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.

(b) Petitioner shall appear before the Investigating OfÏcer as and when required.

(c) Petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses; nor shall he tamper with the evidence.

(d) Petitioner shall not commit any similar offences while he is on bail.

(e) Petitioner shall not leave India without the permission of the Court having jurisdiction.

In case of violation of any of the above conditions or if any modification or deletion of the conditions are required, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider such applications, if any, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, notwithstanding the bail having been granted by this Court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top