SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 16943

THANKA – Appellant
Versus
UKKANDATH SHYLAJA – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

Respondents 1 and 2 are the decree holders who preferred R.C.P.No.33/2013 before the Rent Control Court, Ernakulam for an order of eviction against the remaining respondents imputing tenancy right on them and obtained an order of eviction on 21.10.2014 under Section 11(2) (b), 11(3) and 11(4)(iii) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965.

2. The appellant is the claim petitioner in E.A.No.21/2015 in E.P.No.154/2014 of the Munsiff's Court, Ponnani. The aforesaid petition is filed by the appellant under Order XXI Rule 97 of the Code of Civil Procedure claiming independent right over the residential premises bearing Door No.255 in Ward No.32 of Ponnani Municipality. By the order dated 25.11.2017, the learned Munsiff dismissed the application. Feeling aggrieved, the appellant preferred first appeal before the Sub Court, Tirur. The first appeal was dismissed as per judgment dated 30.7.2021 in AS 68/2017 of the Sub Court, Tirur. Hence, this Execution Second Appeal.

3. The claim petitioner contends that the rent control proceedings is collusive in nature between the parties and the order of eviction passed therein is not executable as against her. She would

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top