SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 12217

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A.BADHARUDEEN, J
K.R.BABU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The accused in SC No.662/2012 (2nd accused in OR No.68/2003 of Ranni Excise range) on the file of the Additional District & Sessions Judge No.II, Pathanamthitta has preferred this appeal challenging the conviction and sentence imposed against him as per judgment dated 2.1.2014 in the above case. The State of Kerala is the respondent herein.

2. I would like to refer the parties in this appeal as 'prosecution' and 'accused' hereinafter, for easy reference.

3. The brief facts of the case:

The prosecution allegation is that on 1.10.2013 as directed by the Deputy Excise Commissioner Southern Range, Excise officials of Kollam conducted raid in TS No.18/03-04 of Ranny Range and seized arrack from the toddy shop where license was given in favour of the 2nd accused. Thereafter, contraband was recovered and crime alleging commission of offences under Section 8 (1)

r/w 8 (2) of Abkari Act was registered and investigated. Thereafter, charge laid against Accused Nos.1 and 2 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Ranny. Thereafter, case against the 2nd accused was committed to the court of Sessions after refiling the case of the 1st accused as his presence could not be secured

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top