SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 18238

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, J
LINU M.A. – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.P.K.SOYUZ, SRI.E.V.BABYCHAN

JUDGMENT

The petitioner states that she is the absolute owner in title and possession of 45.80 Ares of land comprised in Re-Sy. No.83/3 in Block No.42 of Thiruvaniyoor Village. She is aggrieved by Ext.P5 notice issued by the 2nd respondent as per which she has been informed that it has been decided to deduct an extent of 11.28 Ares of land from the Thandaper account of the petitioner. The petitioner contends that no notice was served to her prior to Ext.P5 notice and according to her, the decision to deduct 11.28 Ares was taken without affording the petitioner an opportunity of being heard. It is in the afore circumstances that the petitioner is before this Court seeking the following reliefs.

i. call for the records leading to Exhibit P5 notice and quash the same by issue of a writ of certiorari or such other writ order or direction.

ii. Declare that 45.80 Ares (113.17 cents) of land comprised in Re.Sy.No.83/3 in Block No.42 of Thiruvaniyoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk is in the exclusive ownership and

possession of the petitioner.

iii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any appropriate writ, order or

direction directing commanding (sic) the 2nd respondent to conduct a hearing and consider and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top